Short review of Futurism at Tate Modern

Loved it. A hundred years ago, the theme of speed defined the art movement that became futurism. There’s a corollary, or at least a parallel with Google and everything now in digital. Against that, the works focused on the street, the relationship with Cubism, and the joyful nature of the cabaret below still make it human despite the harsh technological focus and fascist connections.

Gino Severini, The Dance of the Pan-Pan at the "Monico", 1909-1911 / 1959-1960

Gino Severini, The Dance of the Pan-Pan at the "Monico", 1909-1911 / 1959-1960

Found this which attempts to define futurism:

The Futurists loved speed, noise, machines, pollution, and cities; they embraced the exciting new world that was then upon them rather than hypocritically enjoying the modern world’s comforts while loudly denouncing the forces that made them possible. Fearing and attacking technology has become almost second nature to many people today; the Futurist manifestos show us an alternative philosophy.

Too bad they were all Fascists.

It’s also interesting for the manifestos, particularly on gender and how the movement emerged and was challenged by Vorticism. Go see it before it finishes on the 20th of Sept.

Synopsis that grabbed me on Marinetti:

“Marinetti was a master of publicity, and his writings and dealings with the public and press set the tone for the controversies surrounding Futurism. The movement was defined by the manifestoes and books that he published, which were distributed in many languages. As well as art, Marinetti wanted to revolutionise writing itself. He promoted the idea of ‘words-in-freedom’, liberating language through radical poetic and typographical techniques: ‘Condensed metaphors. Telegraphic images. Maximum vibrations. Nodes of thought.’

I became a member of Tate earlier in the month and it’s a great thing if you’re in London a chunk of the time, need somewhere to hang out, snack, eat, meet friends, use members room (closed in Sept; prefer walking about chatting personally most of the time). Great value as an alternative to a membership of a private club.

Heading to Liverpool in November for Reds v Man City so hoping to check out Joyous Machines and Mark Rothko’s The Seagram Murals at Tate Liverpool.

Good growth is natural growth

Featured

My good friend and collaborator Pete Burden, writes a great blog on Conscious Business. Always well considered and challenging, he recently posed the question “What’s so good about growth?”

It’s a great post and with intelligent, considered comments from Tom Nixon, Duncan Walker and Justin Hunt,  Pete and the others discuss some of the fundamental issues about personal and systemic motivations that fuel what I think is a misunderstanding about ‘human nature’ and ‘growth’.

Business growth, of the profit’s first type being ‘natural’ is about (economic) cycles of behaviour with negative outcomes recently: with consequences felt and experienced personally, socially, economically and politically.  Therefore the idea of good growth is as Pete says open to challenge, particularly when we consider the short-term existence of so many businesses more generally.

Tom’s perspective in the comments is sound although I challenge one point.  “..being greedy animals and growth feeds us” I paused.. Whilst I respect his opinion, I differ fundamentally on this. Being greedy is just an extreme behaviour.

This raises the question of what we understand growth to really mean. Googling ‘define:growth’ brings up growing organically, emergence, from simple to complex, people seeking stimulation, an increase whether planned or not amongst many others including one that is specifically financial from the Motley Fool: “Funds or stocks that carry relatively high valuations, because rapid growth is expected.” All of these are defintions are interesting – an increase planned (expected) or not, the latter or not sums it up for me.

That’s very freerange, and thus ‘natural’. On personal, social and political-economic levels we’re beginning to understand the implications of extreme behaviour and are individually and socially challenging and realigning our values towards more natural and holistic ideas and behaviours. There’s evidence all around us – from the more progressive approaches emerging in business, from social design to social enterprises, fairtrade cooperatives to microbusinesses and groups and (ungroups) forming networks in barcamp style all over the world, including castbrighton.com (which I recently enjoyed participating in the opening meeting) potentially driving all sorts of new movements.

Natural growth is worthy of further exploration because it is about emergence: allowing what comes naturally, to grow. That’s certainly freerange – embracing the planned or unplanned personally, socially, economically, politically whilst being self-aware of learning how to work with extreme behaviours.

UPDATE: thanks to Pete (via Simon Conroy) for sending me this excellent perspective from James Gustave Speth in HBR.. Doing business in a postgrowth society.

Blogging again – inspired by Headshift and social business design

Big day today, something important has happened in the online/digital services sector. I’ve been involved in it for the best part of 15 years now and periodically something happens close to me that I believe will have an important and potentially significant impact.

My pals at Headshift have announced today that they are becoming part of the Dachis group. In the emerging field of social business design, this is really big news. As Lee and Livio, the founders of Headshift,  have compellingly demonstrated over the last six years, collaborative tools, enterprise 2.0, social media and a whole host of other related emergent activities, such as user-centred and network-centric design, agile programming and project management methods – all innovative ingredients, are generating new design and service frameworks that are now legitimate. To me, they’re at the forefront of a business movement that is as they say moving beyond early stage experimentation.

What I’ve experienced first-hand and continue to admire about Headshift is their commitment to principles and practices that are congruent and represent a vision. Headshift’s readme.doc from 2003 continues to resonate. It’s not often easy engaging in pioneering activity and committing to innovation is something that’s vital for most businesses in order to evolve, but few have the bravery and long-term vision to embrace in my experience to date.

There’s lots more to do to realise the group’s vision of smarter, simpler, social businesses but that’s the whole point. Social Business Design as Headshift and Dachis group call it, sums up the learnings and the potential – from the early stages of the journey, from the birth of the accessible internet, through it’s recent social awakening, to how this continues to evolve into the everyday system and lifeworld.

I’m delighted for all involved which includes me as a friend and collaborator. Operating internationally with a kick-ass team in the US and a talented team in the UK is something I’ve been lucky to do with great success during my time with iCrossing. Not only was it a real adventure with some brilliant experiences and outcomes but it made it all seem real. The web exists to connect us. To allow for new relationships, new experiences, new services, new forms of design. So with extended networks and new opportunities Headshift  are in a great position to realise their vision.
Good luck my friends :-)